Everyone in Reykjavik, whatever their opinion, is so fed up with the total thing: Icesave is a criminialized word here. It has been ongoing given prior to 2008. And, you know, this is regularly on the dusk bulletins. Even if you dont assimilate it you"re ill of it. "You can speak about anything," people joke, "so prolonged as the not Icesave."
When they do speak about it, people contend that the unequivocally astray that the total republic should have to compensate for alternative peoples mistakes. But the not a subject of Will we compensate this income back? the a subject of the conditions on that we do it. And right away talks are underway with Britain and the Netherlands, the referendum seems pointless.
The point I keep conference right away is, Whats the point if there are talks about a new understanding that is so majority improved for the Icelandic nation? After all, the going to cost 150 or 200 million krone (�776,000 �1m). Its not similar to we have the income to throw around we need it.
Still it is a inherent right to vote, and we will. One thing is clear: notwithstanding being sleepy of it, people are going to contend no. Its a make a difference of solidarity, to show the nations perspective on the legislation. The understanding we are choosing by casting votes on is only so bad for the Icelandic people. If anything, the referendum seems to have put us in a improved negotiating position: we already have the awaiting of a improved deal, even if the not authorized yet. I feel, and I think majority people feel, majority some-more confident about the countrys destiny than we did prior to the referendum was called.
Helga Arnard�ttir is a promote publisher with St�d 2 television
No comments:
Post a Comment